Creating a stronger, better connected University-wide Communications Community

Page updated on 05 November 2024

Communications Community vision 

The current vision is to establish an integrated communications profession across the University that meets organisational needs and fosters professional development opportunities for Oxford's communications staff.

Communications Community of Practice (CoP) transition

The Comms Community is in the final stages of transitioning from a network to a formal Community of Practice (CoP), aligned with Oxford’s Professional Services Together goals. This transition aims to strengthen support for communications staff, formalise collaboration across the University, and elevate the profile of the communications profession.

This project focuses on the University-wide Communications Community rather than the divisional and college networks that sit alongside it. Some interconnectivity exists between these groups, and any proposed changes will be assessed to ensure they align and provide mutual benefits

Share your thoughts

Feedback is requested to finalise the Communications Community of Practice (CoP) charter, the connected Steering Group terms of reference, and groupings for associated communities. Prepared by the Project Board with insights from the recent survey, workshop, and focus groups, they are key to completing the transition to a CoP and directing activities in 2025.

If you agree with the recommendations, no action is required.

Please email gillianlouisegreen@gmail.com to provide feedback or ask questions by 15 November 2024.

The documents for review were compiled using a consultative process that combined survey results and feedback from communications stakeholders across the collegiate University.

Associated community groupings

An associated community (formerly called sub-community) is a subset of the CoP designed to foster knowledge-sharing among colleagues with similar interests. As these communities develop, they’re expected to become go-to spaces for expert advice, guidance, and skills-sharing, supporting the broader community. Each associated community will have significant autonomy in day-to-day operations, including decisions on meeting frequency, event types, and activities.

Based on recent survey responses, the project board recommends trialling the development of associated communities, prioritising those with the most volunteers ready to lead initial discussions. Interest areas have been grouped into broader communities to attract more members and leaders, aligning with CoP best practices. This approach aims to improve success, with the understanding that each community will progress differently.

Associated community grouping:

  • Campaigns, insights & evaluation: 93 respondents interested, 19 volunteers ready to lead initial discussions. These areas have been combined as evaluation best practices align closely with campaigns, especially research-based ones.
  • Media relations and crisis/reactive communications: 80 respondents interested, 20 volunteers ready to lead initial discussions. These two areas of interest have been combined, as many colleagues interested in media relations also noted crisis communications as a key focus.
  • Staff, student, and change communications: 61 respondents interested, six volunteers ready to lead initial discussions. These areas have been combined as they have similar skill sets.
  • Marketing & CRM: 28 respondents interested, four volunteers ready to lead initial discussions.
  • Social media: 52 respondents interested, three volunteers ready to lead initial discussions.
  • Web design: 43 respondents interested, three volunteers ready to lead initial discussions. Note that the proposal is to expand this to web content/web management.

Progressing associated communities

The community has been invited to provide feedback on the proposed associated community groupings by 15 November. The plan is to begin initial discussions via a staggered approach starting in Hilary term, allowing the CoP to better support volunteers in managing high interest levels. This phased approach will enable feedback gathering to improve the initiation process as it progresses and refine the initial list. For a new associated community to be formed, a charter should be drafted using the People and Organisational Development team’s CoP toolkit for agreement by the sponsor and Steering Group. All new communities will hold equal status to the existing ones (Events Management, Creatives, and Video Makers).

Additional suggestions from the recent survey will be included in the CoP's annual review and evaluation. Further ideas can be directed to the Steering Group via a dedicated email address, to be set up shortly.

Progressing the initial priorities

While an associated community is discipline based, a priority is an initiative which helps advance the community’s vision. The proposal is to create smaller, more focused working groups for each priority, composed of early volunteers from the recent survey. These groups will have terms of reference agreed upon by the Steering Group, update the whole community regularly and engage the broader community at key points, ensuring alignment and gathering input across the CoP. The Steering Group will contact the volunteers and work with them to agree on a schedule for progressing these priorities.

The initial priorities for the Communications CoP include:

  • Defining communications career pathways:
    • Establishing job families and job descriptions.
    • Identifying and sharing training and development opportunities.
    • Supporting the CoP’s efforts to advocate for communications as a profession.
  • Providing access to best-practice resources:
    • Offering a broader range of templates.
    • Sharing case studies and exemplary work and improving signposting to existing resources and templates.
    • Developing a list of specialists from across the University, supporting the formation and growth of associated communities.
  • Supporting specific colleague groups:
    • Providing tailored support for newcomers to the organisation and communications community
    • Connecting and supporting single-person communications departments/functions.

Additional suggestions from the recent survey will be included in the CoP's annual review and evaluation. Further ideas can be directed to the Steering Group via a dedicated email address, to be set up shortly.


Communications Community of Practice event

Join us for an in-person and online event to conclude the project and launch of the CoP charter:

  • Date: 11 December 2024
  • Time: 2:00 to 3:30 pm
  • Location: University Offices, Wellington Square (hybrid format)
  • Host: James Colman, Director of Public Affairs and Communications

The session will outline the CoP’s next steps, with the first Steering Group meeting scheduled for January 2025.

Register for the event here


Stay updated 

For more information about the current Comms Community, visit the Comms Hub. It includes helpful guidance and templates for communications professionals. You can also find out information about the video-makers, designers, and event sub-communities on the People and Organisational Development (POD) webpages.

Please check the community’s Teams channel and Comms Digest for project updates.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

If there is a question we haven’t addressed, don't hesitate to get in touch with gillianlouisegreen@gmail.com.

What are the objectives of the Communications Community project?

The Comms Community project aims to advance the community’s vision and deliverables, aligning more closely with the University’s Community of Practice approach as part of the Professional Services Together programme. It seeks to position the community similarly to external exemplars such as the civil service and University College London. These steps will enhance the support for communications colleagues and improve the profession's profile at the University.

What is the Comms Community vision?

The current vision for the Comms Community is as follows:

To establish an integrated communications profession across the University that meets organisational needs and fosters professional development opportunities for our communications staff.

The activities underpinning this vision are:

  1. Clearly defined job families for communications roles
  2. Programme in place to support pan-Oxford careers
  3. Established communities working together to solve common challenges and develop enhanced ways of working.
  4. Formal reporting (direct or matrix) to communications professionals.

The project will cover points 1 to 3 of the vision. 4 will be considered in due course, in particular as the Strategic Review of Professional Services progresses.
 

What are the project’s timelines?

The high-level timelines are outlined below:

Phase 1: Stakeholder engagement (until mid-June):

  1. Engage with Comms Community members to understand their priorities and needs.
  2. Gather examples of good practice from members of existing Communities of Practice across the University.

Phase 2: Analysis and Prioritisation (mid-June to September):

  1. Review findings from phase 1 and prioritise ideas, aligning them with the community’s vision.
  2. Collaborate with community members and the Communication Community Steering Group to evaluate the feasibility of proposed initiatives.

Phase 3: Roadmap Development and Launch (Michaelmas term)

Launch a roadmap detailing all the important deliverables needed to advance the vision and the associated timings.
 

Why now?

Several factors highlight the timeliness of this project:

  • Community growth: Our community has grown significantly recently, predominantly in departments, and we should check that we are meeting the needs of all members, new and old.
  • Your feedback: The Comms Community Steering Group has heard many diverse views on adopting this approach. The current Comms Community reflects some aspects of the definition of a Community of Practice, providing opportunities for training and information sharing. However, there is no formal mechanism for groups to come together to solve common challenges, develop enhanced ways of working or create a documented career path for the profession.
  • Alignment with other professions: The rollout of Communities of Practice is a key part of Professional Services Together. They are increasingly being adopted across the University to enhance member engagement and support, as detailed on the University’s dedicated Communities of Practice webpage
  • Learning from other Universities: Institutions like the University College London have successfully adopted the Communities of Practice approach to enhance communications quality and advance career pathways.

What is the difference between networks and Communities of Practice?

Professional communities take many forms, from informal networks through to highly professional and organised communities of practice.

Community of Practice is a group of individuals who share a common interest or profession and collaborate to improve their skills and knowledge in that area. This collaboration includes peer networking, career development initiatives, reducing duplication and solving shared problems. Communities of Practice tend to have a more formalised structure than networks, respond to specific issues and challenges, and are activity-focused, with the community owning and shaping the agenda.

The current Comms Community reflects some aspects of the definition of a Community of Practice, in that it provides opportunities for training and information sharing. However, there is no formal mechanism for groups to come together to solve common challenges, develop enhanced ways of working or create a documented career path for the profession.

How does transitioning to a more Community of Practice approach align with college and divisional networks?

This project focuses on the University-wide Communications Community rather than the divisional and college networks that sit alongside it. Some interconnectivity exists between these groups, and any proposed changes will be assessed to ensure they align and provide mutual benefits.

The working assumption is that moving forward, the University-wide Community will focus more on strategic activities that advance the vision or deliver important community-wide improvement initiatives (e.g., career paths). All communications colleagues will be invited to participate in these activities, which typically focus on a project or sub-profession. This does not diminish the important role of college and divisional networks in sharing local information and coordinating and amplifying divisional and college messages.
 

What potential opportunities does transitioning to a Community of Practice provide?

This project aims to build on our community strengths with examples of the anticipated benefits of transitioning to a Community of Practice approach being:

  • A greater focus on member needs: Through peer networking, collaboration, and professional development initiatives, to better support members, reduce duplication and solve shared problems.
  • Enhancing reputation: Establishing a formal Community of Practice will elevate the profile of the communications profession within the University.
  • Improving standards: Communities of Practice cultivate a sense of responsibility and commitment, enhancing the quality, consistency and coordination of communications.
  • Greater member development opportunities: through more participation in the community, driven by the desire to learn, share expertise, develop skills or advance careers.

Will I have to apply for membership in any new Comms Community of Practice?

Moving to the CoP model enhances the existing Comms Community rather than replacing it. Colleagues won’t need to reapply for membership, and all members will be automatically added to any new sub-communities, with the option to unsubscribe if they wish.

New members can still apply by completing the form on the Comms Hub

Do I have to get involved in the Community of Practice?

Communications colleagues are welcome to get involved as much or as little as they like. However, the project would appreciate as many colleagues as possible participating before concluding the process during the Michaelmas term. This will ensure the project is as transparent and democratic as possible, allowing everyone's voice to be heard.

Who will be responsible for enacting the change and roadmap?

We are looking for colleagues to take this work forward in line with the Communities of Practice approach. There may be some funding available, but this needs to be confirmed.

What are sub-communities?

Sub-communities are specific areas of specialisms within a wider Community of Practice. Creating sub-communities can be beneficial under the following circumstances:

  • If the community has specialisms (event management, internal communications, digital communications, etc) that may require more focused discussion, collaboration and differentiated activities.
  • Smaller sub-communities can enhance manageability and ensure active participation if a community has many members.
  • They might be appropriate for targeted projects or objectives that need dedicated focus and resources.

All colleagues will belong to the Comms Community, with individuals deciding whether to participate in sub-communities. The full range of roles within a Community of Practice or sub-community of practice can be found on the University’s guidance pages.
 

What areas will the sub-community reflect?

The project aims to gauge the community’s interest in sub-communities by soliciting ideas from members for the focus of potential groups.

Is the project looking for a certain number of volunteers or sub-communities?

Sub-communities will be driven by the number of colleagues interested in a particular area, ensuring adequate capacity and support. We aim to avoid overstretching the community, teams or individuals. Internal and external exemplars typically have between four to six sub-communities. Good practice suggests that each sub-community should have at least 20 colleagues interested in participating, with two to four colleagues volunteering to lead the group.

How many sub-communities does the Communications Community have?

Currently, the community has two groups representing event management and video makers, with a third designer group being launched. These communities have been set up and are run by community members. The project aims to ascertain whether any other groups exist that we need to be aware of, and to consider how these link to the wider community. 

What is a sub-community leader?

Leaders typically create the momentum to initiate the group and define its purpose and focus. They facilitate regular meetings that concentrate on solving challenges and sharing learnings.

How much time does being a sub-community leader involve?

The time commitment for a sub-community leader can vary, typically ranging between 0.5 and 2 days per month. This depends on current activities and the frequency of meetings. More leaders generally mean a reduced time commitment for each individual.

Is there a profile for a sub-community leader?

There is no standard profile for a leader. While full-time employees might have more time to contribute, this is not always true. Leaders may assume the role to support their day job, share their experience, pursue personal development, or seek career advancement. The key attribute of a sub-community leader is enthusiasm.

What are the benefits of sub-community participation or leadership?

The role is expected to last a finite period, usually 12-18 months. Benefits are likely career-related, such as developing the individual’s profile and network.

Is there any training available?

Mentoring sessions are available through the University's People and Organisational Development team.

Do I need to inform my line manager about my involvement in the University-wide Community?

Gaining a line manager’s backing for involvement is crucial, and there are some helpful tips to guide conversations with line managers. Consideration should be given to reflecting significant participation in a sub-community in the person’s work objectives as agreed during an annual Personal Development Review (PDR). In return, the individual should be allocated time within their work role to lead or contribute to the community as agreed between the individual, their line manager, and the Community of Practice sponsor.

What has been the feedback to date on transitioning to a Community of Practice?

Forty one divisional colleagues came forward to provide their views in phase one. A summary is below:

  • Diversity of perspectives: The Comms Community encompasses a wide range of views and core activities. This diversity needs to be considered in the community's development to ensure that varying needs and expectations are addressed.
  • Building on existing strengths: Colleagues expressed a positive view of the current community activities and wanted to build on established strengths.
  • There is an appetite for change: Several colleagues, especially those new to the University, working in small departments or wanting to stretch themselves, are seeking more opportunities for involvement in community-based initiatives.
  • Support for professional growth: All colleagues wanted the community to aid their career progression and provide training. This was the most significant change those interviewed wanted to see. They felt it was more appropriate for a University-wide Community of Practice to advance than a department /college network.
  • Practical support: Colleagues also spoke of their need for practical support and camaraderie to help address common communications-related challenges.

When will the Communications Community transition to a Community of Practice?

To become a registered Community of Practice with the People and Organisational team in HR, a formal process must be followed. The project team is responsible for completing this process and developing the Communications Community of Practice Charter. Once finalised, the charter will be submitted for approval by our sponsor, the Director of Public Relations and Communications.

More information about the process can be found in the University’s Community of Practice toolkit.

How were members of the Communication CoP project team selected?

The team comprises members of the existing Comms Community Steering Group and colleagues who have proactively come forward and expressed an interest in helping with the formation process. While the project team doesn't have formal decision-making power, it will offer recommendations and disband once the Communications CoP is officially registered and a new Steering Group is in place.

What will the new Steering Group look like?

While the terms of reference are still to be written for a new CoP Steering Group, the recommendation is to include representatives from communications sub-communities, those focused on our initial priorities and members of the existing Steering Group. Including some existing Steering Group members will ensure continuity and make the transition to a CoP smoother. As per the guidance, board members will rotate after a set time. Everyone will have an equal say, working together to advance the community’s interests. The sponsor’s role (Director of Public Affairs and Communications) will be to support the group however they can and help align its activities to the University’s strategic themes.

Will Steering Group members change over time?

Yes, it is planned for the board members to rotate after a set time.

Is there a terms of reference for the Steering Group?

A terms of reference will be drafted soon.

How will colleagues be involved moving forward?

In the coming months, the team will contact colleagues who have expressed interest in specific priorities, such as career pathways, knowledge sharing, and providing certain colleagues with on-the-job support, and the project will invite new participants.

When can I expect to see the benefits of the new Communications Community of Practice?

The new Communications Community of Practice and those groups linked to it will take time to evolve through the maturity cycle, which typically involves several stages of development and growth. More formal collaboration and resource-sharing initiatives may emerge within the initial months after the community is formally established. However, the full range of expected benefits, including significant advancements such as developing a communications career pathway akin to sector exemplars, may take up to 12 months to fully materialise.

More information about the process can be found in the University’s Community of Practice toolkit.

When will responsibility for the events programme shift from the current Comms Community Steering Group to the new CoP?

The transition to a CoP is expected to involve grassroots members actively leading the current events programme. Additionally, existing and new sub-communities are anticipated to host additional events in potentially new formats (coffee mornings, surgeries, etc.) to enhance knowledge sharing and peer support. While an exact date for these changes can't be provided yet, the goal is to start implementing them during the 2024/25 academic year. Until then, the current Steering Group will continue to arrange monthly events, with input from the community and divisional communications leads.

Contact us


Email gillianlouisegreen@gmail.com with any questions, input or feedback.